On Sept 10th tail #591UA was recorded at 2 places at one time, thats just the beginning!
flight 93 (or was it?) backtracking tail #'s the 2 591's
 

The official timeline of Sep11th is breaking apart.
Atta's Portland flight did not exist; various official "terror" flights or the tail numbers of their precursors existed twice; new, recently unknown terror drills show, that the scenario of 9/11 was well known; the new "flight plans" and meeting points of the alleged hijacked flights included too many coincidences; the planners of the "hijack" must have had inside knowledge about other flights and their cancellations as well.

1) The "twin tails" of pre-Flight 93

Findings by Brad M, ewing2001 and Frank Levy

October 18, 2004

On September 11th, 2001, "Flight93" was officially listed by the FAA with Tail Number N591UA.
The latest findings of Brad M, ewing2001, Frank Levi, and others, show that something appears to be fishy with the history of this tail number, which suggests a possible swap scenario of this Flight, for whatever reasons.

The question is, if it really was this Flight, who departed Newark on that morning, and if this tail was still around after Sep11th

Currently, a new hunt within the BTS database, shows clearly, that something is irregular in the Timeline of N591UA...

On Sept 10th 2001, Flight 0078 (=N591UA) arrived in Newark from SFO (San Fransisco) at 6:54 wheel on time. However, Flight 0507, with the same tail number, 591UA departed Boston Logan for ORD (Chicago) at 7:39 wheel off time, as current screenshots show. How is this possible?

Also, Boston does not have records of N591UA arriving at Logan that day and Newark only has it departing once at 19:40 PM EST.

There seems to be a problem here. It had 45 mins from touchdown in San Francisco before it left in another city.

Recently reestablished, the "official Flight 93" began as a scheduled service from EWR (Newark) to SFO on September 5th 2001, but the first Tuesday flight in 2001, was on 9-11; there was no Newark to SF flight before.

On September 11th, BTS shows 591UA for "Flight93" with a Wheels-off Time at 08:28 AM EST, but which tail departed?
And did it really reach Shanksville?

I also followed N591UA and found the same irregularities:

1) San Francisco International (SFO)

Scheduled Arrival Time: UA 09/10/2001 0075 N591UA EWR 17:29 PM EST

with almost 3 hours delay:
Wheels on Time: UA 09/10/2001 0075 N591UA EWR 22:07
Actual Arrival Time: UA 09/10/2001 0075 N591UA EWR 22:15
Scheduled Departure Time: UA 09/10/2001 0078 N591UA EWR 22:05 PM EST
Wheels off time: UA 09/10/2001 0078 N591UA EWR 23:15

2) Newark (EWR)

Scheduled Arrival Time: UA 09/10/2001 0078 N591UA SFO 6:22
Actual Arrival Time: UA 09/10/2001 0078 N591UA SFO 7:01
Wheels-on Time: UA 09/10/2001 0078 N591UA SFO 6:54 <----!!!
Scheduled Departure Time: UA 09/10/2001 0075 N591UA SFO 14:30
Actual Departure Time: UA 09/10/2001 0075 N591UA SFO 18:30
Wheels-off-Time: UA 09/10/2001 0075 N591UA SFO 19:40

A look to Chicago and Boston:

3) O'Hare International (ORD, Chicago)

Wheels-on Time: UA 09/10/2001 0507 N591UA BOS 8:39
Actual Arrival Time UA 09/10/2001 0507 N591UA BOS 8:48
Scheduled Arrival Time: UA 09/10/2001 0507 N591UA BOS 9:07 AM EST
Wheels off time: UA 09/10/2001 0642 N591UA EWR 10:43 AM EST <----!!
Scheduled Departure Time: UA 09/10/2001 0642 N591UA EWR 10:30 AM EST

4) Boston (BOS)
Scheduled Arrival Time: UA 09/10/2001 N591UA NONE
Actual Arrival Time: UA 09/10/2001 N591UA NONE
Wheels-on Time: UA 09/10/2001 N591UA NONE

however...
Actual Departure Time: UA 09/10/2001 0507 N591UA ORD 7:26
Scheduled Departure Time: UA 09/10/2001 0507 N591UA ORD 7:30
Wheels of Time: UA 09/10/2001 0507 N591UA ORD 7:39 <---!!!!

2) New "flight plans" of Flight93

More oddities have been recognised by researcher Frank Levi.
The estimated arrival times of "Flight 93" (aka N591UA) starting at 2:15 PM, then it changes SOUTH of Pittsburgh, well after it was hijacked and a new flight plan was filed to 10:28.

Also another close researcher pointed out to me, that all flights were being diverted by the time 93 was officially hijacked. And yet the transcripts give the impression that it was still on its way to San Francisco at the time.

According to some hobby plane spotters, N591UA was still flying in 2003.
Some researchers also indicated that this original UA-flight is "masked" as N594UA.
There is a website, which shows 23 Boeing 757s, which were ordered, but never built.
What happened with them?

An investigation into the production of the Tail Numbers (N591UA has construction #28142) also revealed, that "State Street Bank & Trust Co" is the trustee for the plane owners for 590 592 593.
So it it makes one suspect that N591UA could have been in that sequence, too.

On N594UA also some findings from Brad M.:

On September 10th, N594 departed Detroit at 11:12 to ORD as 1581
594 arrived in Chicago from DTW at 10:58 as 1581
It arrived before it left.
This is not possible.

(More here: http://911bts.brad.com/594.html )

3) Back to "flight175"

More interesting, as Brad M. points out, flight 175 (aka N612UA) also shows as being diverted on Sept 11th. Did it also file a new flight plan ?

(Map redesigned by Frank Levi)

"Also overheard was a request for a flight path to Kennedy – but
the controller, who was not controlling the plane himself, is unsure
whether the pilot or hijacker made the request."
(Source: /www.csmonitor.com/earlyed/earlyUSA5.html)

Tracking N612UA before Sep11th does not reveal anything suspicious:
 
 

*612 departs JFK to SFO at 9:40 as 0845
*612 arrives SFo from JFK (flight 0845) at 12:07
*612UA(flight 170)departs SFO to Boston at 13:34 (*WOT)
*612 arrive BOS from SFO as 170 at 21:50
*612 no data leaving boston after (*thx to Brad M.)
 

The history of N519UA aka "Flight91"

Also interesting, the history of Tail Number N519UA, which later became "flight91" during September 2001.

Many passengers of "flight93" came originally from "flight91", which had tail number N519UA.

Flight 91 was originally scheduled for after 9:00 AM, as mentioned in an article:
That morning, (Mary Steiner) "called to check on her flight, Flight 91, due to leave after 9 A.M.. She moved up to Flight 93 for an earlier start..."

Officially the alleged hijackers booked their flights between August 24-29.
Therefore they possibly must have been on an original passenger list of Flight 91 as well, because Flight93 did not exist at that time (it was first scheduled on Sep5th, 2001)

The journey:

1)
Wheels-on Time: 09/01/2001 N594UA NONE
Wheels-on Time: 09/02 -09/05 N594UA NONE
Wheels-on Time: 09/06 N594UA as Flight 0088 from LAX 6:04
Wheels-on-Time: 09/07 -09/11 N594UA NONE

2)
Left Newark on 09/07/2001 to San Francisco
Scheduled Departure Time: UA 09/07/2001 0081 N594UA SFO 07:00 AM EST
Wheels-off Time: UA 09/07/2001 0081 N594UA SFO 07:23 AM EST
 

3)
Arrived in SF on 09/07:
Scheduled Arrival Time: UA 09/07/2001 0081 N594UA EWR 10:10
Wheels-on Time: UA 09/07/2001 0081 N594UA EWR 9:46
Scheduled Departure Time: UA 09/07/2001 0186 N594UA IAD 11:00
Wheels-off Time: UA 09/07/2001 0186 N594UA IAD/Dulles 11:10

4)
arrived in DC Dulles on 09/07:
Scheduled Arrival Time UA 09/07/2001 0186 N594UA SFO 19:02
Scheduled Departure Time: UA 09/07/2001 0225 N594UA SFO 20:00
Wheels-off Time: UA 09/07/2001 0225 N594UA SFO 20:44
 

5)
arrived in SF again on 09/07:
Wheels-on Time in SF: UA 09/07/2001 0225 N594UA from IAD/Dulles 23:11
(no wheels-off on that day after this time)

Skipping to September 9th, we find it in Denver:

Wheels-off Time: UA 09/10/2001 1179 N594UA DEN/Denver 15:56

6)
arrived in Denver on 09/10
Scheduled Arrival Time: UA 09/10/2001 1179 N594UA IAD 17:15
Wheels on Time: UA 09/10/2001 1179 N594UA IAD 17:07
Scheduled Departure Time: UA 09/10/2001 1197 N594UA SEA 17:55
Wheels-off time: UA 09/10/2001 1197 N594UA SEA 18:10

7)
arrived in Seattle on 09/10
Scheduled Arrival Time: UA 09/10/2001 1197 N594UA DEN 19:35
Wheels-on Time: UA 09/10/2001 1197 N594UA DEN 19:25
Scheduled Departure Time: UA 09/10/2001 N594UA NONE
Wheels-off time: UA 09/10/2001 N594UA NONE
Scheduled Departure Time: UA 09/11 -09/12 N594UA NONE

Why was "flight91" aka N594UA cancelled?

United Airlines was contacted on this matter and didn't respond yet.
 

The Colgan Phantom Flight

Officially, Mohammad Atta and Abdulaziz Alomari took another flight, on that morning of Sep11th, from Portland, Maine to Boston.
The 9/11 report, recently suggested for a national book award, confirms it:

"... Atta and Omari boarded a 6:00 A.M. flight from Portland to Boston’s Logan International Airport..."

The report even mentions the Flight Number: 5930
According to other mainstream reports, they took Colgan Airlines.

Colgan does business as US Airways and even has its planes painted in US Airways colors and it flight attendants wear US Airways uniforms.
Colgan's flight numbers are indeed US Airways 5000-5999.

There is only one problem. No plane with that tail number took off that morning, as the screenshots reveals There was also no other BTS data about other "scheduled Departure Times" of this flight.

American Eagle seems to be the only possible flight, which departed to Boston as FLIGHT 4637 (aka N266MQ).
However, this flight was already scheduled for 5:30am (Wheels off: 5:40), which contradicts all official reports.

This flight was too early to board, because Atta and Alomari officially arrived shortly before 6AM.
Then there is also the "last picture" of Atta, which is taken around 5:45am at the airport in Portland.

If this flight did not exist, Atta couldn't have been arrived in time on Flight 11 (aka N334AA).
But there is also another problem. No flight with the tail number N334AA arrived on the morning of Sep11th in Boston, neither there was a flight 11 with a departure or wheels-off-time at all.

On September 10th, N334AA (officially later turning into Flight11) arrived at 15:34 PM EST (as Flight 196), almost 10 hours after it also went back and forth as Flight 198 to San Francisco.

But what happened with N334AA on Sep11th?
And why do two different mainstream reports tell us, that the "plane" departed from two different gates? (26 and 32)

Buffalo Niagara -the final drill?

On Sunday, September 9th, just two days before 9/11, more than 200 rescue workers - including firefighters, paramedics, police and disaster preparedness workers - participated in a 2 1/2-hour drill based on the premise that a bomb had exploded on a jet, killing 20 passengers and injuring 62. (flight 11 had officially 88 passengers, without the alleged "hijackers")

From the complete print version of the original article (*thx to Frank Levy and John Doe II):

A DC-9 airliner parked on a tarmac contained dozens of individuals
playing passengers. Fire engines and ambulances took up strategic
positions near the disabled craft, and police patrol cars cordoned off
the area.

Twenty mental health services volunteers from the Greater Buffalo
Chapter of the American Red Cross counseled "victims" and "family members."

The disaster's 25 unscathed survivors and their family members even
staged a reunion..."

The article continues, with eerily similarities to the attack in New York:

"...Robert A. Stone, *airport* manager: ..."We received a call of a biological agent on the plane and that a bomb had gone off in the rear of the craft, which was coming from New York City," said Ken Turner, director of emergency services for the Red
Cross. .."

...to be continued...
 

ADDENDUM (by WoodyBox) :
==============================

"...THE ARRIVAL DATA OF EVERY TRANSCONTINENTAL
WEST-EAST-FLIGHT WHOSE DEPARTURE DAY DIFFERS FROM THE

ARRIVAL DAY (BECAUSE IT STARTS FROM THE WEST COAST IN
THE EVENING) ARE REGISTERED UNDER THE *DEPARTURE* DAY,
NOT THE ACTUAL ARRIVAL DAY.

Example: N591A was in SFO on the 10th

Flight Number: 78

Scheduled departure time: 22:05
Actual departure time: 23:00
Scheduled elapsed time: 317 minutes
Actual elapsed time: 301 minutes.

Now check the departure data of BOS on the *10th*
for flight 78:

Scheduled arrival time: 6:22
Actual arrival time: 7:01
Scheduled elapsed time: 317 minutes
Actual elapsed time: 301 minutes

You see the that the actual elapsed time of
arrival/departure is identical, meaning it's the same
flight.

That's also the reason why the arrival data of N612UA
(flight 175) and N334AA (flight 11) don't appear on
the 11th, but on the 10th.
 

The reason is probably that the data recording of the
flight begins with the departure. The date is
recorded, too, of course, but it is not changed when
the arrival data are transferred to the airline..."