911 : "Twin tails" of pre-Flight 93 and other "phantom flights"
Posted by on 2004/10/18 22:53:58 (1196 reads)
On Sept 10th tail #591UA was recorded
at 2 places at one time, thats just the beginning!
The official timeline of Sep11th is breaking apart.
1) The "twin tails" of pre-Flight 93
Findings by Brad M, ewing2001 and Frank Levy
October 18, 2004
On September 11th, 2001, "Flight93" was officially listed
by the FAA with Tail Number N591UA.
The question is, if it really was this Flight, who departed Newark on that morning, and if this tail was still around after Sep11th
Currently, a new hunt within the BTS database, shows clearly, that something is irregular in the Timeline of N591UA...
On Sept 10th 2001, Flight 0078 (=N591UA) arrived in Newark from SFO (San Fransisco) at 6:54 wheel on time. However, Flight 0507, with the same tail number, 591UA departed Boston Logan for ORD (Chicago) at 7:39 wheel off time, as current screenshots show. How is this possible?
Also, Boston does not have records of N591UA arriving at Logan that day and Newark only has it departing once at 19:40 PM EST.
There seems to be a problem here. It had 45 mins from touchdown in San Francisco before it left in another city.
Recently reestablished, the "official Flight 93" began as a scheduled service from EWR (Newark) to SFO on September 5th 2001, but the first Tuesday flight in 2001, was on 9-11; there was no Newark to SF flight before.
On September 11th, BTS shows 591UA for "Flight93" with
a Wheels-off Time at 08:28 AM EST, but which tail departed?
I also followed N591UA and found the same irregularities:
1) San Francisco International (SFO)
Scheduled Arrival Time: UA 09/10/2001 0075 N591UA EWR 17:29 PM EST
with almost 3 hours delay:
2) Newark (EWR)
Scheduled Arrival Time: UA 09/10/2001 0078 N591UA SFO
A look to Chicago and Boston:
3) O'Hare International (ORD, Chicago)
Wheels-on Time: UA 09/10/2001 0507 N591UA BOS 8:39
4) Boston (BOS)
2) New "flight plans" of Flight93
More oddities have been recognised by researcher Frank
Also another close researcher pointed out to me, that all flights were being diverted by the time 93 was officially hijacked. And yet the transcripts give the impression that it was still on its way to San Francisco at the time.
According to some hobby plane spotters, N591UA was still
flying in 2003.
An investigation into the production
of the Tail Numbers (N591UA has construction #28142) also revealed,
Street Bank & Trust Co" is the trustee for the plane owners for
590 592 593.
On N594UA also some findings from Brad M.:
On September 10th, N594 departed Detroit at 11:12 to ORD
(More here: http://911bts.brad.com/594.html )
3) Back to "flight175"
More interesting, as Brad M. points out, flight 175 (aka N612UA) also shows as being diverted on Sept 11th. Did it also file a new flight plan ?
"Also overheard was a request for a flight path to Kennedy
Tracking N612UA before Sep11th does not reveal anything
*612 departs JFK to SFO at 9:40 as 0845
The history of N519UA aka "Flight91"
Also interesting, the history of Tail Number N519UA, which later became "flight91" during September 2001.
Many passengers of "flight93" came originally from "flight91", which had tail number N519UA.
Flight 91 was originally scheduled for after 9:00 AM,
as mentioned in an article:
Officially the alleged hijackers booked their flights
between August 24-29.
Skipping to September 9th, we find it in Denver:
Wheels-off Time: UA 09/10/2001 1179 N594UA DEN/Denver 15:56
Why was "flight91" aka N594UA cancelled?
United Airlines was contacted on this matter and didn't
The Colgan Phantom Flight
Officially, Mohammad Atta and Abdulaziz Alomari took another
flight, on that morning of Sep11th, from Portland, Maine to Boston.
"... Atta and Omari boarded a 6:00 A.M. flight from Portland to Boston’s Logan International Airport..."
The report even mentions the Flight Number: 5930
Colgan does business as US Airways and even has its planes
painted in US Airways colors and it flight attendants wear US Airways uniforms.
There is only one problem. No plane with that tail number took off that morning, as the screenshots reveals There was also no other BTS data about other "scheduled Departure Times" of this flight.
American Eagle seems to be the only possible flight, which
departed to Boston as FLIGHT 4637 (aka N266MQ).
This flight was too early to board, because Atta and Alomari
officially arrived shortly before 6AM.
If this flight did not exist, Atta couldn't have been
arrived in time on Flight 11 (aka N334AA).
On September 10th, N334AA (officially later turning into Flight11) arrived at 15:34 PM EST (as Flight 196), almost 10 hours after it also went back and forth as Flight 198 to San Francisco.
But what happened with N334AA on Sep11th?
Buffalo Niagara -the final drill?
On Sunday, September 9th, just two days before 9/11, more than 200 rescue workers - including firefighters, paramedics, police and disaster preparedness workers - participated in a 2 1/2-hour drill based on the premise that a bomb had exploded on a jet, killing 20 passengers and injuring 62. (flight 11 had officially 88 passengers, without the alleged "hijackers")
From the complete print version of the original article (*thx to Frank Levy and John Doe II):
A DC-9 airliner parked on a tarmac contained dozens of
Twenty mental health services volunteers from the Greater
The disaster's 25 unscathed survivors and their family
The article continues, with eerily similarities to the attack in New York:
"...Robert A. Stone, *airport* manager: ..."We received
a call of a biological agent on the plane and that a bomb had gone off
in the rear of the craft, which was coming from New York City," said Ken
Turner, director of emergency services for the Red
...to be continued...
ADDENDUM (by WoodyBox) :
"...THE ARRIVAL DATA OF EVERY TRANSCONTINENTAL
ARRIVAL DAY (BECAUSE IT STARTS FROM THE WEST COAST IN
Example: N591A was in SFO on the 10th
Flight Number: 78
Scheduled departure time: 22:05
Now check the departure data of BOS on the *10th*
Scheduled arrival time: 6:22
You see the that the actual elapsed time of
That's also the reason why the arrival data of N612UA
The reason is probably that the data recording of the
flight 93 maps